4.5 Article

Investigating the Presence of SARS CoV-2 in Free-Living and Captive Animals

Journal

PATHOGENS
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pathogens10060635

Keywords

SARS CoV-2; serology; RNA detection; free-living wild animals; zoo animals

Categories

Funding

  1. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) [INT0098]
  2. Croatian Veterinary Institute
  3. Croatian Science Foundation [HRZZ-UIP-2017-05-8580]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

After testing dominant free-living and captive wildlife species in Croatia for anti-SARS CoV-2 antibodies and viral RNA, there was no evidence of animal infection. Further investigation is needed, especially regarding the impact of wildlife sample features on serological testing.
Due to SARS CoV-2 recombination rates, number of infected people and recent reports of environmental contamination, the possibility of SARS CoV-2 transmission to animals can be expected. We tested samples of dominant free-living and captive wildlife species in Croatia for the presence of anti-SARS CoV-2 antibodies and viral RNA. In total, from June 2020 until February 2021, we tested blood, muscle extract and fecal samples of 422 free-living wild boars (Sus scrofa), red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and jackals (Canis aureus); blood and cloacal swabs of 111 yellow-legged gulls (Larus michahellis) and fecal samples of 32 zoo animals. A commercially available ELISA (ID.Vet, France) and as a confirmatory test, a surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT; GenScript, Netherlands) were used. Fecal samples were tested for the presence of viral RNA by a real-time RT-PCR protocol. Fifteen out of 533 (2.8%) positive ELISA results were detected; in wild boars (3.9%), red foxes (2.9%) and jackals (4.6%). However, the positive findings were not confirmed by sVNT. No viral RNA was found. In conclusion, no spillover occurred within the investigated period (second COVID-19 wave). However, further investigation is needed, especially regarding wildlife sample features for serological tests.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available