4.5 Review

Non-invasive home telemonitoring in patients with decompensated heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

ESC HEART FAILURE
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages 3696-3708

Publisher

WILEY PERIODICALS, INC
DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.13475

Keywords

Heart failure; Telemedicine; Telemonitoring; Telerehabilitation; Remote consultation; Mortality; Hospitalization; Quality of life

Funding

  1. Viipurin tuberkuloosisaatio
  2. Finnish State Research Funding (VTR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This systematic review and meta-analysis found that non-invasive home telemonitoring did not significantly reduce all-cause hospitalizations and mortality in patients with recently decompensated heart failure. However, interventions that directly altered heart failure medication showed significant effects on reducing all-cause hospitalizations.
We planned this systematic review and meta-analysis to study an estimate of the effect of non-invasive home telemonitoring (TM) in the treatment of patients with recently decompensated heart failure (HF). A systematic literature search was conducted in the Medline, Cinahl, and Scopus databases to look for randomized controlled studies comparing TM with standard care in the treatment of patients with recently decompensated HF. The main outcomes of interest were all-cause hospitalizations and mortality. Eleven original articles met our eligibility criteria. The pooled estimate of the relative risk of all-cause hospitalization in the TM group compared with standard care was 0.95 (95% CI 0.84-1.08, P = 0.43) and the relative risk of all-cause death was 0.83 (95% CI 0.63-1.09, P = 0.17). There was significant clinical heterogeneity among primary studies. HF medication could be directly altered in three study interventions, and two of these had a statistically significant effect on all-cause hospitalizations. The pooled effect estimate of TM interventions on all-cause hospitalizations and all-cause death in patients with recently decompensated heart failure was neutral.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available