4.7 Article

Proposal and experimental case study on building ventilating fan fault diagnosis based on cuckoo search algorithm optimized extreme learning machine

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2020.100975

Keywords

Fault diagnosis; Cuckoo search algorithm; Extreme learning machine; Fan; Building energy

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51706202]
  2. Key R&D project of Zhejiang Province [2020C04010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The fan fault diagnosis method using the CS algorithm optimized ELM model can learn signal features more effectively, improve fan performance, and bring benefits of energy, economy, and safety.
As the necessary auxiliary equipment in the fields of building energy system, the fan's healthy condition is very important for energy saving and public safety. Machine-learning fault diagnosis can improve fan performance and bring benefits of energy, economy, and safety. However, the vibration signal of the fan is particularly susceptible to interference from other factors, which brings great trouble to the existing machine-learning fault diagnosis Therefore, in order to learn useful fault features more effectively, a fan fault diagnosis method based on cuckoo search (CS) algorithm optimized extreme learning machine (ELM) is proposed in this paper. Firstly, wavelet packet extracts the original signal features. Secondly, with the help of the powerful search ability of the CS algorithm, the ELM model parameters are optimized to fully learn the signal features. Finally, the optimized ELM is tested through two cases. The experimental fault data of two types of fan are collected and employed to verify the effectiveness of this method, and the superiority compared with other existing methods. The results show that the proposed method can increase total recognition rate by at least 2.25% and at most 21.49%, indicating good progress and application potential.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available