Journal
JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
Volume 40, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2021.102783
Keywords
Copper foam; Thermal conductivity; Thermal properties; Palmitic acid; Composite phase change materials; Thermal energy storage
Categories
Funding
- National Natural Science Foundation of China [51676095]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study prepared palmitic acid/copper foam carbon nanotubes composite phase change materials by melting impregnation, showing that adding carbon nanotubes with different mass fractions could significantly improve the thermal conductivity of the composite phase change materials. The higher the pore density of the copper foam, the higher the thermal conductivity of the composite phase change materials.
Palmitic acid (PA)/copper foam composites with carbon nanotubes (CNT) composite phase change materials (CPCM) were prepared by melting impregnation. PA was used as phase change material (PCM), and copper foams with different pore density (40, 80 and 110 PPI, PPI: Pore Per Inch) were used as supporting materials. CNT with different mass fractions (1%, 3% and 5%) were added to further improve the thermal conductivity of the CPCM. Chemical structure and crystal structure of the composites were measured by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and X-ray diffractometer (XRD) respectively, and it was proved that PA was physically adsorbed in copper foams. The microstructures of the CPCM were observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM), and PA was well adsorbed by copper foams. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) were used to test thermal properties of the CPCM, and the results showed that CPCM had high latent heat and good thermal stability. Thermal conductivity of the CPCM was measured by thermal conductivity meter (TCM). The higher the pore density of copper foam is, the higher the thermal conductivity of the CPCM is, and the CNT has an obvious improvement effect on the thermal conductivity of the CPCM. Thermal conductivity of the CPCM2 was 3.02 W/(m.K), which was 17.76 times higher than that of the PA. Thermal conductivity of the CPCM6 with mass fraction of 5% CNT was 1.82 times higher than that of the CPCM2.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available