4.7 Article

Phase transition enhancement through circumferentially arranging multiple phase change materials in a concentric tube

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
Volume 40, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2021.102672

Keywords

Latent heat thermal energy storage; Multiple phase change materials; Fins distribution; Melting; Solidification

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51804348]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China [2020JJ5734]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University [2019zzts261]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes the circumferential arrangement of multiple PCMs in a finned concentric tube thermal energy storage system to improve phase transition uniformity. Numerical studies show that using multiple PCMs can shorten the melting-solidification time, with the optimal case saving 14.7% compared to using a single PCM.
In this paper, circumferentially arranging multiple phase change materials (PCMs) in a finned concentric tube thermal energy storage (TES) system is proposed to improve the phase transition uniformity. The phase transition area is divided into three regions by fins and filled with different PCMs. The effects of multiple PCMs arrangements and fins distributions on the thermal performance of the TES system were numerically studied using commercial software ANSYS FLUENT. The phase transition and energy storage rates were examined. Results demonstrate that using multiple PCMs shortens the melting-solidification time compared with using single PCM. The enhancement potential increases with the decrease of temperature difference between HTF and PCM. Multiple PCMs with non-uniform fins angle further enhances melting and solidification. The optimal case with multiple PCMs saves 14.7% melting-solidification time compared to the case with single PCM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available