4.5 Article

Potassium isotope evidence for sediment recycling into the orogenic lithospheric mantle

Journal

GEOCHEMICAL PERSPECTIVES LETTERS
Volume 18, Issue -, Pages 43-47

Publisher

EUROPEAN ASSOC GEOCHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.7185/geochemlet.2123

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2019YFA0708400]
  2. Programme of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities (111 project) [B18048]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports high precision potassium isotope data for 41 representative volcanic rocks from the Alpine-Himalayan orogenic belt, showing a potassium isotope range significantly exceeding that of the pristine mantle and suggesting that this range can be replicated by recycling up to 5% isotopically heterogeneous sediments into the depleted mantle. These results highlight potassium isotopes as a potential tracer of recycled sediments in the mantle.
Post-collisional highly potassic magmatism in large orogenic belts has been taken as evidence for recycling of continent-derived K-rich sediments within the orogenic lithospheric mantle. Potassium isotopes may provide important insights into the origins of K in these magmas, since subducting sediments exhibit much more variable K isotopic compositions relative to the mantle. Here we report high precision K isotope data for 41 representative potassic and ultra-potassic volcanic rocks from the whole Alpine-Himalayan orogenic belt. delta K-41(NIST) (SRM3141a) of these samples vary from -1.55 parts per thousand to -0.32 parts per thousand, comparable to the range of global subducting sediments but significantly exceeding the range of pristine mantle defined by oceanic basalts (-0.42 +/- 0.08 parts per thousand). Monte Carlo simulation suggests this large K isotopic range can be reproduced by recycling of up to 5 % isotopically heterogeneous sediments into the depleted mantle. Our results highlight K isotopes as a potential tracer of recycled sediments in the mantle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available