4.7 Review

Coenzyme Q10 and Male Infertility: A Systematic Review

Journal

ANTIOXIDANTS
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antiox10060874

Keywords

Coenzyme Q10; antioxidants; oxidative stress; male infertility; idiopathic oligoasthenozoospermia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Infertility affects 15% of couples worldwide, with male factor being involved in 50% of cases. Research shows a strong association between oxidative stress and poor seminal fluid quality in male infertility, making antioxidants, such as CoQ10, an important part of treatment. Studies have shown beneficial effects of CoQ10 supplementation on semen parameters, but further research is needed to determine the optimal dosage and combination with other antioxidants.
Infertility affects 15% of couples worldwide. A male factor is involved in 50% of cases. The etiology of male infertility is poorly understood, but there is evidence for a strong association between oxidative stress (OS) and poor seminal fluid quality. For this reason, therapy with antioxidants is one of the cornerstones of empirical treatment of male infertility. Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10)-an essential cofactor for energy production with major antioxidant properties-is commonly used to support spermatogenesis in idiopathic male infertility. This systematic review aims to elucidate the usefulness of CoQ10 supplementation in the treatment of male infertility, particularly with regard to semen quality assessed by conventional and advanced methods, and pregnancy rates. All studies report a beneficial effect of CoQ10 supplementation on semen parameters, although randomized controlled trials are a minority. Moreover, the optimal dosage of CoQ10 or how it can be combined with other antioxidant molecules to maximize its effect is unknown. However, CoQ10 is still one of the most promising molecules to treat idiopathic male infertility and warrants further investigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available