4.7 Review

Detection of Urinary Antibodies and Its Application in Epidemiological Studies for Parasitic Diseases

Journal

VACCINES
Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9070778

Keywords

noninvasive test; urine diagnosis; urine ELISA; parasite infection; neglected tropical diseases (NTDs); mass drug administration (MDA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Urine samples containing high levels of antibodies for ELISA testing offer a convenient and important alternative to blood samples in epidemiological studies of infectious diseases. This method could potentially provide a safer and more accessible approach to studying diseases in the future.
For epidemiological studies of infectious diseases, pathogen-specific antibody levels in an area give us essential and appropriate information. The antibodies against pathogens are usually detected in blood, the drawing of which inconveniences people. Collection of blood increases the risk of accidental infections through blood, and it is difficult to obtain the participation of the target populations, especially the younger generation. On the other hand, urine samples, which contain a high enough level of antibodies for ELISA, can be harmlessly and easily collected and therefore have been used for epidemiological studies for diseases. The antibody examination of urine has been used for the epidemiology of parasitic diseases with a high sensitivity and specificity of serum samples. In this paper, we reviewed antibody assays with urine for seven parasitic diseases that urine diagnostic methods have reported in the past, and these are important infections included in NTDs, caused, for example, by Leishmania donovani, Wuchereria bancrofti, Schistosoma japonicum, Paragonimus westermani, Echinococcus granulosus, Echinococcus multilocularis, Strongyloides stercoralis, and Opisthorchis viverrini. The easy and safe urine surveillance system might be an admirable tool for future epidemiological studies for infectious diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available