4.7 Article

Influenza Virus-like Particle (VLP) Vaccines Expressing the SARS-CoV-2 S Glycoprotein, S1, or S2 Domains

Journal

VACCINES
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9080920

Keywords

COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; virus-like particle; vaccine; antibody; neutralization

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [2018R1A6A1A03025124]
  2. Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [HV20C0085, HV20C0142]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed virus-like particles containing different proteins of SARS-CoV-2 and showed that they could induce mice to produce spike protein-specific antibodies. S full and S1 immune sera elicited virus-neutralizing activities, suggesting the potential of these VLPs as effective vaccines.
The ongoing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic had brought disastrous consequences throughout the entire world. While several manufactured vaccines have been approved for emergency use, continuous efforts to generate novel vaccines are needed. In this study, we developed SARS-CoV-2 virus-like particles (VLPs) containing the full length of spike (S) glycoprotein (S full), S1, or S2 together with the influenza matrix protein 1 (M1) as a core protein. Successfully constructed VLPs expressing the S full, S1, and S2 via Sf9 cell transfections were confirmed and characterized by Western blot and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). VLP immunization in mice induced higher levels of spike protein-specific IgG and its subclasses compared to naive control, with IgG2a being the most predominant subclass. S full and S1 immune sera elicited virus-neutralizing activities, but these were not strong enough to fully inhibit receptor-ligand binding of the SARS-CoV-2. Neutralizing activities were not observed from the S2 VLP immune sera. Overall, our findings revealed that S full or S1 containing VLPs can be developed into effective vaccines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available