4.7 Article

High Prevalence of Anti-PF4 Antibodies Following ChAdOx1 nCov-19 (AZD1222) Vaccination Even in the Absence of Thrombotic Events

Journal

VACCINES
Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9070712

Keywords

SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; ChAdOx1 nCov-19; anti-PF4; antibodies; vaccine; thrombosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine can generate anti-PF4 antibodies in recipients even without thrombotic symptoms, but these antibodies are not enough to cause clinically evident thrombosis. This insight into the multifactorial pathophysiology of thrombotic events induced by the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine is crucial for ongoing investigations.
It is unclear whether the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine can induce the development of anti-PF4 antibodies in vaccinated individuals who have not developed thrombosis. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the presence of antibodies against heparin/PF4 in adults who received a first dose of the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine, and correlate them with clinical data and antibody responses to the vaccine. We detected non-platelet activating anti-PF4 antibodies in 67% (29/43) of the vaccinated individuals on day 22 following the first dose of the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine, though these were detected in low titers. Furthermore, there was no correlation between the presence of anti-PF4 IgG antibodies and the baseline clinical characteristics of the patients. Our findings suggest that the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine can elicit anti-PF4 antibody production even in recipients without a clinical manifestation of thrombosis. The presence of anti-PF4 antibodies was not sufficient to provoke clinically evident thrombosis. Our results offer an important insight into the ongoing investigations regarding the underlying multifactorial pathophysiology of thrombotic events induced by the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available