4.7 Article

The Health Belief Model Predicts Intention to Receive the COVID-19 Vaccine in Saudi Arabia: Results from a Cross-Sectional Survey

Journal

VACCINES
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9080864

Keywords

COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; vaccine hesitancy; health belief model; Saudi Arabia

Funding

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research, Qassim University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the intention to accept the COVID-19 vaccine in Saudi Arabia is relatively low, with only a small proportion having a positive intent. Factors such as older age, being healthcare workers/professionals, receiving the flu vaccine, and the perception of COVID-19 severity were positively associated with vaccination intent. The individual's access to complete information and the prevalence of vaccine uptake among the public play important roles in the decision-making process.
We examined the intention and predictors of accepting the COVID-19 vaccine in Saudi Arabia. We conducted a nation-wide, cross-sectional online survey between February and March 2021. A total of 1387 people (>= 18 years) participated. Only 27.3% adults had a definite and 30.2% had a probable vaccination intent; 26.8% and 15.6% had a probable and definite negative vaccination intent. Older people (>= 50 years) (p < 0.01), healthcare workers/professionals (p < 0.001), and those who received flu vaccine (p < 0.001) were more likely to have a positive intent. People from Riyadh were less likely to receive the vaccine (p < 0.05). Among the health belief model constructs, perceived susceptibility to and severity of COVID-19 (p < 0.001), and perceived benefit of the vaccine (p < 0.001) were positively associated with vaccination intent, whereas perceived barriers had a negative association (p < 0.001). Individuals were more likely to receive the vaccine after obtaining complete information (p < 0.001) and when the vaccine uptake would be more common amongst the public (p < 0.001).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available