4.7 Review

Fibroblasts Influence the Efficacy, Resistance, and Future Use of Vaccines and Immunotherapy in Cancer Treatment

Journal

VACCINES
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9060634

Keywords

tumor microenvironment; cancer-associated fibroblasts; immunotherapy; cancer vaccines; chemokines; cytokines

Funding

  1. NCI T32 Fellowship [NCI 5T32CA009035-43]
  2. National Cancer Institute [P30 CA006927]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CAFs, a prominent cell type in tumors, play a crucial role in altering the immune landscape within tumors and affecting the response to current immunotherapy treatments. Research is now focusing on utilizing immune-based strategies to target CAFs themselves.
Tumors are composed of not only epithelial cells but also many other cell types that contribute to the tumor microenvironment (TME). Within this space, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are a prominent cell type, and these cells are connected to an increase in tumor progression as well as alteration of the immune landscape present in and around the tumor. This is accomplished in part by their ability to alter the presence of both innate and adaptive immune cells as well as the release of various chemokines and cytokines, together leading to a more immunosuppressive TME. Furthermore, new research implicates CAFs as players in immunotherapy response in many different tumor types, typically by blunting their efficacy. Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta), two major CAF proteins, are associated with the outcome of different immunotherapies and, additionally, have become new targets themselves for immune-based strategies directed at CAFs. This review will focus on CAFs and how they alter the immune landscape within tumors, how this affects response to current immunotherapy treatments, and how immune-based treatments are currently being harnessed to target the CAF population itself.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available