4.7 Review

Development and Delivery Systems of mRNA Vaccines

Journal

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.718753

Keywords

mRNA vaccine; molecular design; drug delivery; administration; COVID-19 mRNA vaccine

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21575058]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program (863 Program) of China [2014AA020904]
  3. Guangdong Province Science and Technology Project [2017A010105025]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

mRNA vaccine development has made significant progress in individualized tumor vaccines. While the production process is simple and safety profiles are good, inherent limitations such as degradation and side effects still exist. Appropriate carriers can enhance immune responses, improve biocompatibility, and biosafety.
Since the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2, mRNA vaccine development has undergone a tremendous drive within the pharmaceutical field. In recent years, great progress has been made into mRNA vaccine development, especially in individualized tumor vaccines. mRNA vaccines are a promising approach as the production process is simple, safety profiles are better than those of DNA vaccines, and mRNA-encoded antigens are readily expressed in cells. However, mRNA vaccines also possess some inherent limitations. While side effects such as allergy, renal failure, heart failure, and infarction remain a risk, the vaccine mRNA may also be degraded quickly after administration or cause cytokine storms. This is a substantial challenge for mRNA delivery. However, appropriate carriers can avoid degradation and enhance immune responses, effector presentation, biocompatibility and biosafety. To understand the development and research status of mRNA vaccines, this review focuses on analysis of molecular design, delivery systems and clinical trials of mRNA vaccines, thus highlighting the route for wider development and further clinical trials of mRNA vaccines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available