4.7 Article

STING1 Promotes Ferroptosis Through MFN1/2-Dependent Mitochondrial Fusion

Journal

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.698679

Keywords

MFN1; 2; ferroptosis; mitochondria; dynamic; STING1

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81872323, 82073299]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ferroptosis is a type of iron-dependent regulated cell death where the ER protein STING1 promotes cell death by increasing mitochondrial fusion. This discovery establishes a new cell death mechanism and potential strategy for enhancing ferroptosis-based therapy.
Ferroptosis is a type of iron-dependent regulated cell death caused by the disruption that occurs when oxidative stress and antioxidant defenses interact, and then driven by lipid peroxidation and subsequent plasma membrane ruptures. The regulation of ferroptosis involves many factors, including the crosstalk between subcellular organelles, such as mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum (ER), lysosomes, lipid droplets, and peroxisomes. Here, we show that the ER protein STING1 (also known as STING or TMEM173) promotes ferroptosis in human pancreatic cancer cell lines by increasing MFN1/2-dependent mitochondrial fusion, but not mitophagy-mediated mitochondrial removal. The classic ferroptosis inducer erastin, but not sulfasalazine, induces the accumulation of STING1 in the mitochondria, where it binds to MFN1/2 to trigger mitochondrial fusion, leading to subsequent reactive oxygen species production and lipid peroxidation. Consequently, in vitro or xenograft mouse models show that the genetic depletion of STING1 or MFN1/2 (but not the mitophagy regulator PINK1 or PRKN) reduces the sensitivity of pancreatic cancer cells to ferroptosis. These findings not only establish a new mitochondrial fusion-dependent cell death mechanism, but also indicate a potential strategy for enhancing ferroptosis-based therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available