4.7 Review

A systematic review of geographic indices of disadvantage with implications for older adults

Journal

JCI INSIGHT
Volume 6, Issue 20, Pages -

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.141664

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities of the NIH [R01MD010243]
  2. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the NIH [U54 HD090256]
  3. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the NIH [UL1TR002373, KL2TR002374]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted a systematic review to identify key variables for constructing neighborhood-level disadvantage indices, with education and employment being the most prevalent variables. The review identified 7 core domains, which should be considered for inclusion in future indices to enhance understanding of neighborhood-level disadvantage in older adults. Targeting specific domains can lead to the development of a new US-specific index with health policy applications, especially for characterizing the impact of lived disadvantage in older adults.
BACKGROUND. Neighborhood-level socioeconomic disadvantage has wide-ranging impacts on health outcomes, particularly in older adults. Although indices of disadvantage are a widely used tool, research conducted to date has not codified a set of standard variables that should be included in these indices for the United States. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of literature describing the construction of geographic indices of neighborhood level disadvantage and to summarize and distill the key variables included in these indices. We also sought to demonstrate the utility of these indices for understanding neighborhood-level disadvantage in older adults. METHODS. We conducted a systematic review of existing indices in the English-language literature. RESULTS. We identified 6021 articles, of which 130 met final study inclusion criteria. Our review identified 7 core domains across the surveyed papers, including income, education, housing, employment, neighborhood structure, demographic makeup, and health. Although not universally present, the most prevalent variables included in these indices were education and employment. CONCLUSION. Identifying these 7 core domains is a key finding of this review. These domains should be considered for inclusion in future neighborhood-level disadvantage indices, and at least 5 domains are recommended to improve the strength of the resulting index. Targeting specific domains offers a path forward toward the construction of a new US-specific index of neighborhood disadvantage with health policy applications. Such an index will be especially useful for characterizing the life-course impact of lived disadvantage in older adults.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available