4.6 Article

Ocrelizumab Extended Interval Dosing in Multiple Sclerosis in Times of COVID-19

Journal

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000001035

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
  2. Hertie Foundation
  3. German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF)
  4. Biogen
  5. Novartis
  6. Bundesinstitut fur Risikobewertung (BfR)
  7. Else Kroner Fresenius Foundation
  8. Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss (G-BA)
  9. German Academic Exchange Service
  10. Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Studies (IZKF) Muenster
  11. German Foundation Neurology
  12. Alexion
  13. Almirall
  14. Amicus Therapeutics Germany
  15. Biogen Idec
  16. Diamed
  17. Fresenius Medical Care
  18. Sanofi-Aventis
  19. HERZ Burgdorf
  20. Merck Serono
  21. ONO Pharma
  22. Roche
  23. Teva

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that extending interval dosing of ocrelizumab for RRMS patients during the COVID-19 pandemic did not result in decreased effectiveness compared to standard interval dosing. Both treatment regimens were effective in maintaining clinical stability and preventing disease progression.
Objective To evaluate the clinical consequences of extended interval dosing (EID) of ocrelizumab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods In our retrospective, multicenter cohort study, we compared patients with RRMS on EID (defined as >= 4-week delay of dose interval) with a control group on standard interval dosing (SID) at the same period (January to December 2020). Results Three hundred eighteen patients with RRMS were longitudinally evaluated in 5 German centers. One hundred sixteen patients received ocrelizumab on EID (median delay [interquartile range 8.68 [5.09-13.07] weeks). Three months after the last ocrelizumab infusion, 182 (90.1%) patients following SID and 105 (90.5%) EID patients remained relapse free (p = 0.903). Three-month confirmed progression of disability was observed in 18 SID patients (8.9%) and 11 EID patients (9.5%, p = 0.433). MRI progression was documented in 9 SID patients (4.5%) and 8 EID patients (6.9%) at 3-month follow-up (p = 0.232). Multivariate logistic regression showed no association between treatment regimen and no evidence of disease activity status at follow-up (OR: 1.266 [95% CI: 0.695-2.305]; p = 0.441). Clinical stability was accompanied by persistent peripheral CD19(+) B-cell depletion in both groups (SID vs EID: 82.6% vs 83.3%, p = 0.463). Disease activity in our cohort was not associated with CD19(+) B-cell repopulation. Conclusion Our data support EID of ocrelizumab as potential risk mitigation strategy in times of the COVID-19 pandemic. Classification of Evidence This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with RRMS, an EID of at least 4 weeks does not diminish effectiveness of ocrelizumab.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available