4.7 Review

Bayesian Analysis Reporting Guidelines

Journal

NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR
Volume 5, Issue 10, Pages 1282-1291

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41562-021-01177-7

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous surveys have revealed a lack of important information in reports of statistical analyses, leading to issues of transparency and reproducibility. The proposal of Bayesian analysis reporting guidelines (BARG) aims to address these issues and improve the quality of research.
Previous surveys of the literature have shown that reports of statistical analyses often lack important information, causing lack of transparency and failure of reproducibility. Editors and authors agree that guidelines for reporting should be encouraged. This Review presents a set of Bayesian analysis reporting guidelines (BARG). The BARG encompass the features of previous guidelines, while including many additional details for contemporary Bayesian analyses, with explanations. An extensive example of applying the BARG is presented. The BARG should be useful to researchers, authors, reviewers, editors, educators and students. Utilization, endorsement and promotion of the BARG may improve the quality, transparency and reproducibility of Bayesian analyses. The Review presents a comprehensive set of Bayesian analysis reporting guidelines (BARG), incorporating features of previous guidelines and extending these with many additional details for contemporary Bayesian analyses. It is accompanied by an extensive example of applying the BARG.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available