4.4 Article

Heterogeneous Reactivity of HCI on CaCO3 Aerosols at Stratospheric Temperature

Journal

ACS EARTH AND SPACE CHEMISTRY
Volume 5, Issue 8, Pages 1896-1901

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00151

Keywords

ICEI ozone,solarradiationnanagement; stratospheric aerosol injection; atmospheric chemistry; climate geo ngineelng

Funding

  1. Eutopia Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Calcite aerosols have been suggested as a potential alternative for stratospheric solar radiation management, with minimal negative impact on stratospheric ozone levels and temperature. However, the heterogeneous chemistry of calcite aerosols with trace gases, such as HCl, at stratospheric conditions, particularly their strong reactive uptake capability, needs further examination.
R e ce n t l y proposed as a possible alternative to sulfatep.fffciesfor stratospheric solartadiationmanagemen management (SSRM), calcite (CaCO3) aerosoishavebeenmndeled to have minimal negativeimpactonburhstratosPhericozonelevel, through heterogeneous chemlsrr'anCstratospherictemperatore. However, the heterogeneous chemistry of CaCO3 aerosols with relevant tracegasessuchasHcf, atstratosphericconditionsisstill underexamined. We studied the kinericsefmciuptakeonairborne r soot xCaC 3aerosolsatstratosph:rictemperature,207 3Kiby performing experuentsunderdtyconditionsusinganaeroshifow tube coupled with acuston-h-iltuuadrhpolechemica110nizationnassspecttometer(C iM S) for HCl detecr- o n The' reactive uptake coefficient for HCI was measured to be 0.076 o.009.Thisexceedsthereactiveupfakecoefficientof0.013+o-00lthat we previouslyreported for thissystemai,u6 K, consistenfvffnfhee21ected negativetemperaturedependence0fgasuptakeuusurid surfaces.Thisfindingsuggests an initial strong reactive uptakeot4cigasuucacoaaerosol surfaces in the stratosphere. ICEI ozone,solarradiationnanagement, stratospheric aerosol

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available