4.5 Article

Straw-derived biochar as the potential adsorbent for U(VI) and Th(IV) removal in aqueous solutions

Journal

BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13399-021-01810-5

Keywords

Uranium; Thorium; Biochar; Adsorption mechanism

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biochar is considered a promising sorbent for removing radioactive uranyl and thorium ions in freshwater due to its efficiency and ease of operation. Experimental results showed good adsorption performance and applicability to various models for U(VI) and Th(IV). The study also identified key properties of the adsorption reaction that positively impact its feasibility.
The radioactive uranyl and thorium ions discharged into freshwater have been the imperative environmental issue arousing great concern. Biochar, owing to its low cost, operational ease, and high efficiency, is touted as the promising sorbent for the U(VI) and Th(IV) removal in aqueous solutions. This study employed several characterization techniques and batch experiments to investigate mechanisms of U(VI) and Th(IV) adsorption on biochar. The kinetic results exhibited the fitness of the pseudo-second-order model. Both U(VI) and Th(IV) removals were influenced by pH, while only the ionic strength effects on U(VI) adsorption were observed. The adsorption of either the U(VI) or the Th(IV) fitted to the Langmuir and Freundlich model well. Natures such as endothermicity, increasing randomness, feasibility, spontaneity, and temperature favor of the adsorption reaction could be found in U(VI) and Th(IV) adsorption (U: Delta H-0 = 36.28, Delta S-0 = 108.84 and Delta G(0) < 0; Th: Delta H-0 = 63.42, Delta S-0 = 134.12 and Delta G(0) < 0). Our results highlighted the importance of biochar as the potentially green adsorbent and provided a practical strategy for radioactive contaminant remediation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available