Social identity and acceptability of wild pig (Sus scrofa) control actions: A case study of Texas hunters

Wild pigs (Sus scrofa) pose significant challenges to wildlife managers. This research explored Texas hunters' acceptability of wild pig control actions, and whether acceptability varied according to hunters' affiliation with four different categories of natural resource organizations as an indicator of social identity. Results of a survey (n = 37,317) revealed that most hunters were accepting of all control actions except toxicants and non-lethal deterrents. Mean acceptability scores for each action differed significantly across the four affiliation categories, but effect sizes were minimal. Hunters affiliated with agricultural organizations were the most accepting of control actions, while hunters with no organizational affiliations were least accepting. Findings suggested that while the type of organization with which a hunter affiliates provides some basis for predicting acceptability of control actions, the association is likely not significant enough to warrant differentiating wild pig outreach messaging on the basis of affiliation.

Automated summary

The research explored the acceptability of wild pig control actions among Texas hunters and found that most hunters were accepting of all control actions except toxicants and non-lethal deterrents. Acceptability varied slightly among hunters affiliated with different types of organizations, with hunters affiliated with agricultural organizations being the most accepting. However, the influence of organizational affiliation on acceptability was not significant enough to justify differentiating outreach messaging based on affiliation.