4.7 Article

Using Genomic Selection to Leverage Resources among Breeding Programs: Consortium-Based Breeding

Journal

AGRONOMY-BASEL
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy11081555

Keywords

genomic selection; plant breeding; wheat

Funding

  1. USDA: National Institute for Food and Agriculture [2020-67013-30874.e]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The formation of a genomic selection-based breeding consortium among soft red winter wheat breeding programs allows for genotype and phenotype cooperation, increasing the effective size of each program and improving accuracy by sharing germplasm and utilizing family relationships.
Genomic selection has many applications within individual programs. Here, we discuss the benefits of forming a GS-based breeding consortium (GSC) among programs within the context of a recently formed a GSC of soft red winter wheat breeding programs. The GSC will genotype lines from each member breeding program (MBP) and conduct cooperative phenotyping. The primary GSC benefit is that each MBP can use GS to predict the local and broad value of all germplasm from all MBPs including lines in the early stages of testing, thus increasing the effective size of each MBP without significant new investment. We identified eight breeding aspects that are essential to GSC success and analyzed how our GSC fits those criteria. We identified a core of >5700 related lines from the MBPs that can serve in training populations. Germplasm from each MBP provided breeding value to other MBPs and program-specific adaption was low. GS accuracy was acceptable within programs but was low between programs when using training populations with little testing connectivity, but increased when using data from trials with high testing connectivity between MBPs. In response we initiated sparse-testing with a germplasm sharing scheme utilizing family relationship to connect our phenotyping of early-stage lines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available