4.5 Article

Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 and Bifidobacterium animalis BB-12 in pectin and sodium alginate: A comparative study on viability, stability, and structure

Journal

FOOD SCIENCE & NUTRITION
Volume 9, Issue 9, Pages 5103-5111

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2470

Keywords

freeze-drying; gastrointestinal; hydrogels; microencapsulation; probiotics

Funding

  1. Urmia University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study showed that microencapsulation of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium animalis inside hydrogels can prolong their survival in various conditions, with high encapsulation efficiency. The survival rate of encapsulated bacteria was significantly higher than free cells, indicating the suitability of the microencapsulation process for protection.
The present study aimed at examining whether the microencapsulation of Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 and Bifidobacterium animalis BB-12 inside hydrogels could prolong their survival in freeze-drying conditions, stored at 4celcius and in the gastrointestinal medium. Microencapsulation was performed by emulsion with a syringe, while sodium alginate and high methoxyl pectin were used as a carrier material. A relatively high efficiency of encapsulation was obtained (>92%). Z-Average and pdI in samples were not significant (p < .05). In different treatments, changes in the number of bacteria after freeze-drying, 30 days of storage, and gastrointestinal conditions, compared to each other, were significant (p < .05). However, the survival rate after a reduction during storage was higher than 10(6) cfu/g, indicating the suitability of the microencapsulation process. The surface of microcapsules observed by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) confirmed the success of encapsulation. Finally, a lower decrease in the count of microencapsulated was observed in comparison to the free cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available