Journal
ANIMALS
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages -Publisher
MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ani11061643
Keywords
pain; facial expressions; objective methods; horse; computer vision; machine learning; deep recurrent two-stream network; convolutional networks; facial keypoint detection; facial action units
Funding
- Swedish Research Council FORMAS [2020-01840, 2016-01760]
- Swedish Research Council [2016-03967]
- Swedish Research Council [2016-01760, 2016-03967, 2020-01840] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council
- Formas [2016-01760, 2020-01840] Funding Source: Formas
- Vinnova [2016-03967] Funding Source: Vinnova
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Facial activity can convey valid information about pain in horses, but accurate scoring is challenging. Two general approaches to automatic horse pain recognition have been suggested: objectively defined facial expression aspects and flexible machine learning with raw videos. Both approaches show promising results.
Simple Summary Facial activity can convey valid information about the experience of pain in a horse. However, scoring of pain in horses based on facial activity is still in its infancy and accurate scoring can only be performed by trained assessors. Pain in humans can now be recognized reliably from video footage of faces, using computer vision and machine learning. We examine the hurdles in applying these technologies to horses and suggest two general approaches to automatic horse pain recognition. The first approach involves automatically detecting objectively defined facial expression aspects that do not involve any human judgment of what the expression means. Automated classification of pain expressions can then be done according to a rule-based system since the facial expression aspects are defined with this information in mind. The other involves training very flexible machine learning methods with raw videos of horses with known true pain status. The upside of this approach is that the system has access to all the information in the video without engineered intermediate methods that have filtered out most of the variation. However, a large challenge is that large datasets with reliable pain annotation are required. We have obtained promising results from both approaches. Automated recognition of human facial expressions of pain and emotions is to a certain degree a solved problem, using approaches based on computer vision and machine learning. However, the application of such methods to horses has proven difficult. Major barriers are the lack of sufficiently large, annotated databases for horses and difficulties in obtaining correct classifications of pain because horses are non-verbal. This review describes our work to overcome these barriers, using two different approaches. One involves the use of a manual, but relatively objective, classification system for facial activity (Facial Action Coding System), where data are analyzed for pain expressions after coding using machine learning principles. We have devised tools that can aid manual labeling by identifying the faces and facial keypoints of horses. This approach provides promising results in the automated recognition of facial action units from images. The second approach, recurrent neural network end-to-end learning, requires less extraction of features and representations from the video but instead depends on large volumes of video data with ground truth. Our preliminary results suggest clearly that dynamics are important for pain recognition and show that combinations of recurrent neural networks can classify experimental pain in a small number of horses better than human raters.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available