4.4 Review

Aortic stenosis and Heyde's syndrome: A comprehensive review

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES
Volume 9, Issue 25, Pages 7319-7329

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i25.7319

Keywords

Heyde's syndrome; Aortic stenosis; Angiodysplasia; Transcatheter aortic valve replacement; Gastrointestinal bleed; Anti platelet

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heyde's syndrome is a rare systemic disease in older adults, characterized by aortic stenosis, angiodysplasia with bleeding, and acquired von Willebrand syndrome. There are currently no established guidelines for managing the condition, but further studies may change the approach to treatment. Increasing awareness and suspicion of the syndrome can improve diagnostic potential.
Heyde's syndrome is an under reported systemic disease of gastrointestinal and cardiac manifestation in older adults. It is characterized by a triad of aortic stenosis, angiodysplasia with bleeding and acquired von Willebrand syndrome. It is characterized by proteolysis of high molecular weight multimers of von Willebrand Factor and loss of platelet mediated homeostasis. Heyde's syndrome is a treatable condition in most cases, especially in the current era of evolution in interventional cardiology and gastroenterology. There are currently no established guidelines in the management of this condition due to paucity of high quality studies, which warrant future trials. High index of suspicion and increasing the awareness of the syndrome among the general practitioners and sub-specialists will improve the diagnostic potential of Heyde's syndrome. Future studies may change the management aspect of Heyde's syndrome and pave a path for drawing specific guidelines and algorithms. The aim of our review article is to summarize the basic pathophysiology, diagnostics and management of Heyde's syndrome with a special attention to Transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available