4.4 Review

Treatment strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastasis

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES
Volume 9, Issue 21, Pages 5754-5768

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i21.5754

Keywords

Hepatocellular carcinoma; Extrahepatic metastasis; Systemic therapy; Targeted therapy; Immunotherapy; Locoregional therapy

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province of China [2018A0303130165]
  2. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou [201904010046]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review highlights the significance of extrahepatic metastasis in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma, emphasizing the roles of systemic agents and locoregional management while discussing the potential of immunotherapy in HCC treatment.
Extrahepatic metastasis (EHM) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has increasingly been seen due to improved survival with effective management of intrahepatic lesions. The presence of EHM indicates an advanced stage of HCC, for which systemic therapy serves as the standard treatment modality. Since the approval of Sorafenib as the first systemic agent in 2007, it took almost a decade to show its efficacy in both first and further lines of setting until the landscape of systemic drugs was finally expanded. Moreover, with inspiring results from immunotherapy trials in HCC, it appears that the introduction of immunotherapy may lead to an evolution in the portfolio of HCC treatment. Although the locoregional approach in the management of EHM is not recommended for advanced-stage HCC, efforts have been made to demonstrate its efficacy in symptom relief and potential benefit for overall survival. This review provides a summary of recent updates of the systemic agents in the treatment of advanced HCC, with an emphasis on aggressive locoregional management of EHM by various treatment modalities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available