4.7 Article

Woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus) avoid wellsite activity during winter

Journal

GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION
Volume 29, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01737

Keywords

Woodland caribou; Oil and gas; Wellsite; Disturbance; Alberta; Petroleum development; Rangifer tarandus

Funding

  1. Forest Resource Improvement Association of Alberta [FRIP OF-13-006]
  2. Alberta Upstream Petroleum Research Fund [15-ERPC-01, 16-ERPC-01]
  3. British Columbia Oil and Gas Research and Innovation Society [BC OGRIS 15-04]
  4. Foothills Landscape Management Forum, Canadian Natural Resources, Daishowa-Marubeni International Ltd.
  5. fRI Research, Jupiter Resources Ltd.
  6. Manning Diversified Forest Products, Millar Western Forest Products Ltd.
  7. Paramount Resources Ltd.
  8. Talisman Energy Inc.
  9. Tolko Industries Ltd.
  10. Vanderwell Contractors Ltd.
  11. Weyerhaeuser Co. Ltd.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that oil and gas development has a dynamic impact on woodland caribou habitat selection, with wellsites having the greatest influence when human activity is highest, continuing to affect habitat selection even after activity ceases. Caribou tend to avoid wellsites, with avoidance increasing based on the level of activity at the nearest wellsites. Management practices and land-use planning are needed to minimize impacts on caribou and their habitat.
Woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus) are threatened in Alberta in part due to the development of oil and gas resources. To inform best management practices for caribou, we assessed how proximity to wellsites influenced caribou habitat selection, and whether habitat selection varied across wellsite activity phases (i.e., drilling, producing, and inactive). We used location data from 37 GPS-collared caribou monitored between 2007 and 2013 in west-central Alberta to model habitat selection. Our results suggest the influence of wellsites on caribou habitat selection are temporally dynamic. The largest impacts occur when human activity at wellsites is greatest, however wellsites continue to influence caribou habitat selection after human activity ceases. Caribou avoided wellsites, and avoidance increased relative to the degree of activity at the nearest wellsite. During early winter, caribou avoided wellsites in the drilling phase more than inactive and producing wellsites. During late winter, caribou avoided wellsites in producing phases more than inactive wellsites. Caribou may benefit from management practices that include i) seasonal timing restrictions on drilling, ii) reductions of human activity at wellsites, whether in duration or intensity, iii) land-use planning to coordinate the placement of wellsites to minimize impacts to caribou and their habitat, and iv) prompt and effective restoration of wellsites to match original habitat conditions once production has stopped.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available