4.3 Article

Effects of Face Mask Use on Objective and Subjective Measures of Thermoregulation During Exercise in the Heat

Journal

SPORTS HEALTH-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages 463-470

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/19417381211028212

Keywords

face mask microenvironment; rectal temperature; thermal stress; breathing discomfort

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that during 60 minutes of low-to-moderate exercise in the heat, wearing a face mask did not significantly affect body temperature and heart rate, but it did influence overall breathing discomfort. Perceptual variables showed no significant difference between the face mask trials and control trials, except for overall breathing discomfort. Higher relative humidity inside the mask, rating of perceived exertion (RPE), and thermal sensation were significant predictors of increased overall breathing discomfort.
Background: While increased face mask use has helped reduce COVID-19 transmission, there have been concerns about its influence on thermoregulation during exercise in the heat, but consistent, evidence-based recommendations are lacking. Hypothesis: No physiological differences would exist during low-to-moderate exercise intensity in the heat between trials with and without face masks, but perceptual sensations could vary. Study Design: Crossover study. Methods: Twelve physically active participants (8 male, 4 female; age = 24 +/- 3 years) completed 4 face mask trials and 1 control trial (no mask) in the heat (32.3 degrees C +/- 0.04 degrees C; 54.4% +/- 0.7% relative humidity [RH]). The protocol was 60 minutes of walking and jogging between 35% and 60% of relative VO2max. Rectal temperature (T-rec), heart rate (HR), temperature and humidity inside and outside of the face mask (T-micro_in, T-micro_out, RHmicro_in, RHmicro_out) and perceptual variables (rating of perceived exertion (RPE), thermal sensation, thirst sensation, fatigue level, and overall breathing discomfort) were monitored throughout all trials. Results: Mean T-rec and HR increased at 30- and 60-minute time points compared with 0-minute time points, but no difference existed between face mask trials and control trials (P > 0.05). Mean T-micro_in, RHmicro_in, and humidity difference inside and outside of the face mask (Delta RHmicro) were significantly different between face mask trials (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in perceptual variables between face mask trials and control trials (P > 0.05), except overall breathing discomfort (P < 0.01). Higher RHmicro_in, RPE, and thermal sensation significantly predicted higher overall breathing discomfort (r(2) = 0.418; P < 0.01). Conclusion: Face mask use during 60 minutes of low-to-moderate exercise intensity in the heat did not significantly affect T-rec or HR. Although face mask use may affect overall breathing discomfort due to the changes in the face mask microenvironment, face mask use itself did not cause an increase in whole body thermal stress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available