4.6 Article

Experimental Characterization and Energy Performance Assessment of a Sorption-Enhanced Steam-Methane Reforming System

Journal

PROCESSES
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr9081440

Keywords

hydrogen production; sorption-enhanced steam-methane reforming (SESMR); SESMR energy theoretical model; CO2 capture; CO2 emissions reduction

Funding

  1. National Operating Program (PON) for Attraction and International Mobility (AIM) [AIM1829299]
  2. Italian Ministry of University (MIUR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The production of blue hydrogen through sorption-enhanced processes, such as SESMR, offers efficient hydrogen production with substantial energy self-sufficiency, representing a 10% improvement in energy efficiency compared to traditional SMR processes.
The production of blue hydrogen through sorption-enhanced processes has emerged as a suitable option to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Sorption-enhanced steam-methane reforming (SESMR) is a process intensification of highly endothermic steam-methane reforming (SMR), ensured by in situ carbon capture through a solid sorbent, making hydrogen production efficient and more environmentally sustainable. In this study, a comprehensive energy model of SESMR was developed to carry out a detailed energy characterization of the process, with the aim of filling a current knowledge gap in the literature. The model was applied to a bench-scale multicycle SESMR/sorbent regeneration test to provide an energy insight into the process. Besides the experimental advantages of higher hydrogen concentration (90 mol% dry basis, 70 mol% wet basis) and performance of CO2 capture, the developed energy model demonstrated that SESMR allows for substantially complete energy self-sufficiency through the process. In comparison to SMR with the same process conditions (650 degrees C, 1 atm) performed in the same experimental rig, SESMR improved the energy efficiency by about 10%, further reducing energy needs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available