4.6 Article

Synthesis and Physicochemical Characteristics of Chitosan-Based Polyurethane Flexible Foams

Journal

PROCESSES
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr9081394

Keywords

chitosan; polyurethane; synthesis; flexible foams; physicochemical properties; oil sorption; water sorption; water treatment

Funding

  1. UMG Research Project [WZNJ/2021/PZ/02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research focused on utilizing shrimp waste to obtain chitosan for synthesizing chitosan-based polyurethane foams with different concentrations of chitosan. The addition of chitosan influenced the physicochemical characteristics and properties of the tested materials, with 1-3 wt% chitosan foams being softer than neat polyurethane.
The use of shrimp waste to obtain chitosan (Ch) is an essential issue, considering a circular economy, waste management, and its application to environmentally friendly materials. In this study, northern prawn shells were utilized to obtain Ch, which could then be used for synthesizing chitosan-based polyurethane (PUR+Ch) foams with different Ch concentration. The chemical structure, morphology, hardness, thermal properties, viscoelastic properties, and sorption properties in relation to oil and water of these materials were determined. The results present that the addition of Ch into PUR influences the physicochemical characteristics and properties of the tested materials. PUR+Ch foams with 1-3 wt% Ch had more open cells and were softer than neat PUR. PUR+Ch1 had the best thermal properties. PUR+Ch2 foam with 2 wt% Ch as a whole was characterized as having the highest water sorption. The PUR+Ch1 foam with 1 wt% Ch had the best oil sorption. This paper shows that the modification of PUR by Ch is a very promising solution, and PUR+Ch foams can be applied in the water treatment of oil spills, which can be dangerous to the water environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available