4.7 Article

Determination of polymer additive residues that migrate from coffee capsules by means of stir bar sorptive extraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and PARAFAC decomposition

Journal

FOOD PACKAGING AND SHELF LIFE
Volume 28, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2021.100664

Keywords

Plastic additive residues; Coffee; Twister; SBSE-GC-MS; PARAFAC; Migration

Funding

  1. Spanish MINECO (AEI/FEDER, UE) [CTQ2017-88894-R]
  2. Consejeria de la Junta de Castilla y Leon [BU052P20]
  3. European FEDER funds
  4. JCyL [BU052P20]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed an analytical method for ultra-trace determination of plastic additive residues in coffee, facing challenges of matrix effect and target compound residues. The residue concentrations of BHT, BP, and DiBP released from coffee capsules into solid coffee were found to be around 3, 1, and 12 μg/kg, respectively.
This paper reports on the difficulties encountered when developing an analytical method for ultra-trace determination, in a complex matrix, of plastic additive residues which are ubiquitous in the laboratory. The simultaneous qualitative and quantitative determination of an antioxidant (2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methyl-phenol, BHT), an UV stabilizer (benzophenone, BP), and a plasticizer (diisobutyl phthalate, DiBP), released from plastic capsules is carried out in coffee by means of GC-MS and parallel factor analysis decomposition. Stir bar sorptive extraction is used to extract and concentrate the analytes. Coffee samples are prepared with Milli-Q water, which contains residues of the target compounds, which can be significant for ultra-trace analysis and should be subtracted. In addition, matrix effect exits in coffee, so standard addition method is used. The residue concentrations released from the coffee capsules into the solid coffee are around 3, 1, and 12 mu g kg(-1) of BHT, BP and DiBP, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available