4.7 Review

Electrospun Nanofibers/Nanofibrous Scaffolds Loaded with Silver Nanoparticles as Effective Antibacterial Wound Dressing Materials

Journal

PHARMACEUTICS
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13070964

Keywords

wound treatment; wound dressings; scaffolds; nanofibers; nanofibrous membranes; nanofibrous mats; and nanoparticles

Funding

  1. Govan Mbeki Research and Development Centre, University of Fort Hare, Medical Research Council
  2. National Research Foundation, South Africa

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanofibrous scaffolds loaded with silver nanoparticles show promising biological and mechanical outcomes in wound healing, with good antibacterial and bioactive properties.
The treatment of wounds is expensive and challenging. Most of the available wound dressings are not effective and suffer from limitations such as poor antimicrobial activity, toxicity, inability to provide suitable moisture to the wound and poor mechanical performance. The use of inappropriate wound dressings can result in a delayed wound healing process. Nanosize range scaffolds have triggered great attention because of their attractive properties, which include their capability to deliver bioactive agents, high surface area, improved mechanical properties, mimic the extracellular matrix (ECM), and high porosity. Nanofibrous materials can be further encapsulated/loaded with metal-based nanoparticles to enhance their therapeutic outcomes in wound healing applications. The widely studied metal-based nanoparticles, silver nanoparticles exhibit good properties such as outstanding antibacterial activity, display antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory properties, support cell growth, making it an essential bioactive agent in wound dressings. This review article reports the biological (in vivo and in vitro) and mechanical outcomes of nanofibrous scaffolds loaded with silver nanoparticles on wound healing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available