4.6 Article

Assessment of Nitrate Removal Capacity of Two Selected Eukaryotic Green Microalgae

Journal

CELLS
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells10092490

Keywords

nitrate; microalgae; lipids; Chlorella; Chlamydomonas

Categories

Funding

  1. Lendulet-Programme of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences [LP2020-5/2020]
  2. Stipendium Hungaricum Scholarship at the University of Szeged (Hungary)
  3. [NKFI-FK-123899]
  4. [2020-1.1.2-PIACI-KFI-2020-00020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that Chlamydomonas sp. MACC-216 and Chlorella sp. MACC-360 were able to remove nitrate from water bodies, with decreasing total pigment content and increasing lipid content as nitrate concentration increased. Both microalgae demonstrated good growth and nitrate removal capacity in synthetic wastewater.
Eutrophication is a leading problem in water bodies all around the world in which nitrate is one of the major contributors. The present study was conducted to study the effects of various concentrations of nitrate on two eukaryotic green microalgae, Chlamydomonas sp. MACC-216 and Chlorella sp. MACC-360. For this purpose, both microalgae were grown in a modified tris-acetate-phosphate medium (TAP-M) with three different concentrations of sodium nitrate, i.e., 5 mM (TAP-M5), 10 mM (TAP-M10) and 15 mM (TAP-M15), for 6 days and it was observed that both microalgae were able to remove nitrate completely from the TAP-M5 medium. Total amount of pigments decreased with the increasing concentration of nitrate, whereas protein and carbohydrate contents remained unaffected. High nitrate concentration (15 mM) led to an increase in lipids in Chlamydomonas sp. MACC-216, but not in Chlorella sp. MACC-360. Furthermore, Chlamydomonas sp. MACC-216 and Chlorella sp. MACC-360 were cultivated for 6 days in synthetic wastewater (SWW) with varying concentrations of nitrate where both microalgae grew well and showed an adequate nitrate removal capacity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available