4.6 Review

Histologic Transformation in EGFR-Mutant Lung Adenocarcinomas: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications

Journal

CANCERS
Volume 13, Issue 18, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers13184641

Keywords

non-small cell lung cancer; epidermal growth factor receptor gene; EGFR; acquired resistance; histologic transformation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite the initial effectiveness of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, resistance eventually develops in almost all patients. Histological changes in tumors are increasingly recognized as a key mechanism of resistance to EGFR-directed therapies. This article summarizes known histologic changes leading to resistance to EGFR TKIs and explores new pathways for developing effective therapies.
Simple Summary Despite being effective initially, almost all patients eventually develop resistance to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Changes in the histology of the tumor have been increasingly recognized as a critical mechanism of resistance to EGFR-directed therapies. This article summarizes histologic changes known to impart resistance to EGFR TKIs and discusses novel pathways to develop effective novel therapies. With the advent of potent EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the treatment landscape of EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinomas has changed drastically in recent years. However, the development of resistance to EGFR TKIs remains a critical barrier to improving survival in these patients. Histologic transformations to small cell lung carcinoma, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and the sarcomatoid phenotype have been increasingly recognized as important mechanisms of resistance. In this article, we summarize the known biological bases for such phenotypic switches in regard to EGFR TKIs and describe novel pathways that might be harnessed to develop effective novel therapies for patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available