4.7 Article

Urine Phenylacetylglutamine Determination in Patients with Hyperphenylalaninemia

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 10, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10163674

Keywords

phenylketonuria; phenylalanine; phenylalanine hydroxylase deficiency; phenylacetylglutamine; biomarkers; dried blood spot

Funding

  1. Basque Department of Education [IT1281-19]
  2. Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute
  3. Carlos III Health Research Institutes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that PKU patients have higher urine PAG levels than healthy controls, and there is a significant correlation between urine PAG levels and circulating Phe levels in patients with HPA, suggesting the potential role of urine PAG as a non-invasive biomarker in PKU diagnosis.
Phenylketonuria (PKU), an autosomal-recessive inborn error of phenylalanine (Phe) metabolism is the most prevalent disorder of amino acid metabolism. Currently, clinical follow-up relies on frequent monitoring of Phe levels in blood. We hypothesize that the urine level of phenylacetylglutamine (PAG), a phenyl-group marker, could be used as a non-invasive biomarker. In this cross-sectional study, a validated liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS) method was used for urinary PAG quantification in 35 participants with hyperphenylalaninemia (HPA) and 33 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. We have found that (a) PKU patients present higher urine PAG levels than healthy control subjects, and that (b) there is a significant correlation between urine PAG and circulating Phe levels in patients with HPA. In addition, we show a significant strong correlation between Phe levels from venous blood samples and from capillary finger-prick dried blood spot (DBS) samples collected at the same time in patients with HPA. Further research in order to assess the potential role of urine PAG as a non-invasive biomarker in PKU is warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available