4.7 Article

Constraints on the source parameters of low-frequency earthquakes on the San Andreas Fault

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages 1464-1471

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2015GL067173

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation EAR Postdoctoral Fellowship [1249775]
  2. Division Of Earth Sciences
  3. Directorate For Geosciences [1249775] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Low-frequency earthquakes (LFEs) are small repeating earthquakes that occur in conjunction with deep slow slip. Like typical earthquakes, LFEs are thought to represent shear slip on crustal faults, but when compared to earthquakes of the same magnitude, LFEs are depleted in high-frequency content and have lower corner frequencies, implying longer duration. Here we exploit this difference to estimate the duration of LFEs on the deep San Andreas Fault (SAF). We find that the M similar to 1 LFEs have typical durations of similar to 0.2 s. Using the annual slip rate of the deep SAF and the average number of LFEs per year, we estimate average LFE slip rates of similar to 0.24 mm/s. When combined with the LFE magnitude, this number implies a stress drop of similar to 104 Pa, 2 to 3 orders of magnitude lower than ordinary earthquakes, and a rupture velocity of 0.7 km/s, 20% of the shear wave speed. Typical earthquakes are thought to have rupture velocities of similar to 80-90% of the shear wave speed. Together, the slow rupture velocity, low stress drops, and slow slip velocity explain why LFEs are depleted in high-frequency content relative to ordinary earthquakes and suggest that LFE sources represent areas capable of relatively higher slip speed in deep fault zones. Additionally, changes in rheology may not be required to explain both LFEs and slow slip; the same process that governs the slip speed during slow earthquakes may also limit the rupture velocity of LFEs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available