4.7 Review

Scoring Systems for Clinical Colon Capsule Endoscopy-All You Need to Know

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10112372

Keywords

colon capsule endoscopy; colonoscopy; endoscopy score; inter-observer agreement; polyps; bowel preparation; inflammatory bowel disease; minimally invasive

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Colon capsule endoscopy is increasingly recognized as a safe diagnostic tool, especially in the context of reduced endoscopy services. It allows for standardization of reporting and reproducibility through various scores, and can be used to monitor inflammatory bowel disease activity and for colorectal cancer screening.
In the constantly developing era of minimal diagnostic invasiveness, the role of colon capsule endoscopy in colonic examination is being increasingly recognised, especially in the context of curtailed endoscopy services due to the COVID-19 pandemic. It is a safe diagnostic tool with low adverse event rates. As with other endoscopic modalities, various colon capsule endoscopy scores allow the standardisation of reporting and reproducibility. As bowel cleanliness affects CCE's diagnostic yield, a few operator-dependent scores (Leighton-Rex and CC-CLEAR scores) and a computer-dependent score (CAC score) have been developed to grade bowel cleanliness objectively. CCE can be used to monitor IBD mucosal disease activity through the UCEIS and the panenteric CECDAIic score for UC and CD, respectively. CCE may also have a role in CRC screening, given similar sensitivity and specificity rates to conventional colonoscopy to detect colonic polyps >= 10 mm and CRC. Given CCE's diagnostic yield and reproducible clinical scores with high inter-observer agreements, CCE is fast becoming a suitable alternative to conventional colonoscopy in specific patient populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available