4.7 Article

The impact of equilibrating hemispheric albedos on tropical performance in the HadGEM2-ES coupled climate model

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages 395-403

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2015GL066903

Keywords

hemispheric albedo; HadGEM2-ES; tropical precipitation; hurricane frequency; couple climate models

Funding

  1. IMPALA grant via Future Climates for Africa (FCFA) - NERC [NE/M017214/1]
  2. DFID
  3. Joint UK DECC/Defra Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme [GA01101]
  4. Fund for Innovative Climate and Energy Research (FICER)
  5. U.S. Department of Energy by Battelle Memorial Institute [DE-AC05-76RL01830]
  6. NERC [NE/M017265/1, NE/M017214/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/M017265/1, NE/M017214/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Earth's hemispheric reflectances are equivalent to within0.2Wm(-2), even though the Northern Hemisphere contains a greater proportion of higher reflectance land areas, because of greater cloud cover in the Southern Hemisphere. This equivalence is unlikely to be by chance, but the reasons are open to debate. Here we show that equilibrating hemispheric albedos in the Hadley Centre Global Environment Model version 2-Earth System coupled climate model significantly improves what have been considered longstanding and apparently intractable model biases. Monsoon precipitation biases over all continental land areas, the penetration of monsoon rainfall across the Sahel, the West African monsoon jump, and indicators of hurricane frequency are all significantly improved. Mechanistically, equilibrating hemispheric albedos improves the atmospheric cross-equatorial energy transport and increases the supply of tropical atmospheric moisture to the Hadley cell. We conclude that an accurate representation of the cross-equatorial energy transport appears to be critical if tropical performance is to be improved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available