4.7 Article

Classification of Monocytes, Promonocytes and Monoblasts Using Deep Neural Network Models: An Area of Unmet Need in Diagnostic Hematopathology

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10112264

Keywords

digital imaging; artificial intelligence; improving diagnosis accuracy; monocytes; promonocytes and monoblasts; chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) for acute monoblastic leukemia and acute monocytic leukemia; concordance between hematopathologists

Funding

  1. division of hematopathology research funds at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the performance of convolutional neural networks (CNN) in separating monocytic cell subtypes, finding that CNN models significantly improved in predicting two subtypes. The study suggests that combining blasts and promonocytes into a single category could improve accuracy.
The accurate diagnosis of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) subtypes with monocytic differentiation relies on the proper identification and quantitation of blast cells and blast-equivalent cells, including promonocytes. This distinction can be quite challenging given the cytomorphologic and immunophenotypic similarities among the monocytic cell precursors. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of convolutional neural networks (CNN) in separating monocytes from their precursors (i.e., promonocytes and monoblasts). We collected digital images of 935 monocytic cells that were blindly reviewed by five experienced morphologists and assigned into three subtypes: monocyte, promonocyte, and blast. The consensus between reviewers was considered as a ground truth reference label for each cell. In order to assess the performance of CNN models, we divided our data into training (70%), validation (10%), and test (20%) datasets, as well as applied fivefold cross validation. The CNN models did not perform well for predicting three monocytic subtypes, but their performance was significantly improved for two subtypes (monocyte vs. promonocytes + blasts). Our findings (1) support the concept that morphologic distinction between monocytic cells of various differentiation level is difficult; (2) suggest that combining blasts and promonocytes into a single category is desirable for improved accuracy; and (3) show that CNN models can reach accuracy comparable to human reviewers (0.78 +/- 0.10 vs. 0.86 +/- 0.05). As far as we know, this is the first study to separate monocytes from their precursors using CNN.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available