4.7 Review

Endocrine Follow-Up of Men with Non-Obstructive Azoospermia Following Testicular Sperm Extraction

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 10, Issue 15, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10153323

Keywords

hypogonadism; intracytoplasmic sperm injection; Sertoli cell-only syndrome

Funding

  1. Next Fertility Procrea Lugano, Switzerland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Testicular sperm extraction (TESE) is an effective surgical procedure for treating infertility due to non-obstructive azoospermia, but it may cause testicular damage and lead to hypogonadism. Patients with Klinefelter syndrome are more likely to experience profound and longer-lasting hypogonadism compared to other causes of NOA.
Testicular sperm extraction (TESE) is a surgical procedure which, combined with intracytoplasmic sperm injection, constitutes the main treatment for achieving biological parenthood for patients with infertility due to non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). Although it is effective, TESE procedures might cause structural testicular damage leading to Leydig cell dysfunction and, consequently, temporary or even permanent hypogonadism with long-term health consequences. To a lesser extent, the same complications have been reported for microdissection TESE, which is considered less invasive. The resulting hypogonadism is more profound and of longer duration in patients with Klinefelter syndrome compared with other NOA causes. Most studies on serum follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone concentrations negatively correlate with total testosterone concentrations, which depends on the underlying histology. As hypogonadism is usually temporary, and a watchful waiting approach for about 12 months postoperative is suggested. In cases where replacement therapy with testosterone is indicated, temporary discontinuation of treatment may promote the expected recovery of testosterone secretion and revise the decision for long-term treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available