4.7 Article

Tolerability and Efficacy of s.c. IgG Self-Treatment in ME/CFS Patients with IgG/IgG Subclass Deficiency: A Proof-of-Concept Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10112420

Keywords

chronic fatigue syndrome; myalgic encephalomyelitis; autoimmunity; immunology; IgG replacement; IgG deficiency; biomarker

Funding

  1. Baxalta, US Inc [BT13-21454]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An open trial on ME/CFS patients receiving self-administered s.c. IgG therapy showed clinical improvement in a subset of patients. Treatment efficacy was measured through fatigue and physical functioning assessments, with 5 patients showing clinical response at month 12.
Background: Chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a complex disease frequently triggered by infections. IgG substitution may have therapeutic effect both by ameliorating susceptibility to infections and due to immunomodulatory effects. Methods: We conducted a proof of concept open trial with s.c. IgG in 17 ME/CFS patients suffering from recurrent infections and mild IgG or IgG subclass deficiency to assess tolerability and efficacy. Patients received s.c. IgG therapy of 0.8 g/kg/month for 12 months with an initial 2 months dose escalation phase of 0.2 g and 0.4 g/kg/month. Results: Primary outcome was improvement of fatigue assessed by Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFQ; decrease >= 6 points) and of physical functioning assessed by SF-36 (increase >= 25 points) at month 12. Of 12 patients receiving treatment per protocol 5 had a clinical response at month 12. Two additional patients had an improvement according to this definition at months 6 and 9. In four patients treatment was ceased due to adverse events and in one patient due to disease worsening. We identified LDH and soluble IL-2 receptor as potential biomarker for response. Conclusion: Our data indicate that self-administered s.c. IgG treatment is feasible and led to clinical improvement in a subset of ME/CFS patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available