Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial
Andreas Obermair et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2020)
Recurrence Rates in Patients With Cervical Cancer Treated With Abdominal Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Review Study
Shitanshu Uppal et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2020)
Surgical Management of Early Cervical Cancer: When Is Laparoscopic Appropriate?
Stefano Greggi et al.
CURRENT ONCOLOGY REPORTS (2020)
Survival after a nationwide adoption of robotic minimally invasive surgery for early-stage cervical cancer - A population-based study
Pernille T. Jensen et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER (2020)
Survival of patients with early-stage cervical cancer after abdominal or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a nationwide cohort study and literature review
Hans H. B. Wenzel et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER (2020)
SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer
Luis Chiva et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER (2020)
Updated Opinion of the Uterus Commission of the Gynecological Oncology Working Group (AGO) and the Gynecological Endoscopy Working Group (AGE) of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) on the Randomized Study Comparing Minimally Invasive with Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Early-stage Cervical Cancer (LACC)
Peter Hillemanns et al.
GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE (2019)
Efficacy of robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer compared with that of open and laparoscopic surgery A separate meta-analysis of high-quality studies
Sha-sha Zhang et al.
MEDICINE (2019)
The two Achilles heels of surgical randomized controlled trials: differences in surgical skills and reporting of average performance
Farr R. Nezhat et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2019)
Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff - a multicenter analysis
Christhardt Kohler et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER (2019)
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Jonathan A. C. Sterne et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2019)
How should gynecologic oncologists react to the unexpected results of LACC trial?
Jeong-Yeol Park et al.
JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2018)
Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer
Pedro T. Ramirez et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2018)
Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Yue Zhao et al.
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES (2017)
Cervical cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
C. Marth et al.
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY (2017)
Patterns of recurrence and survival after abdominal versus laparoscopic/robotic radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer
Tae-Wook Kong et al.
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH (2016)
ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
Penny Whiting et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2016)
Soft-tissue re-growth following fibre retention osseous resective surgery or osseous resective surgery: a multilevel analysis
Francesco Cairo et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY (2015)
Comparison of Laparoscopic-Assisted Radical Vaginal Hysterectomy and Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in the Treatment of Cervical Cancer
Chel Hun Choi et al.
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY (2012)
Recurrence and Survival After Random Assignment to Laparoscopy Versus Laparotomy for Comprehensive Surgical Staging of Uterine Cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 Study
Joan L. Walker et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2012)
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Julian P. T. Higgins et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2011)
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Kenneth F. Schulz et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2010)
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
Alessandro Liberati et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2009)
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
David Moher et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2009)
Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group Trial
James Fleshman et al.
ANNALS OF SURGERY (2007)
Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer - Five-year results of a randomized prospective trial
CGS Huscher et al.
ANNALS OF SURGERY (2005)
Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer:: a randomised trial
AM Lacy et al.
LANCET (2002)
Share Paper
