4.7 Review

Current Status and Future Perspective of Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Peptic Ulcer Bleeding: A Review of Recent Literature

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 10, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10163527

Keywords

peptic ulcer; bleeding; deep learning; artificial intelligence

Funding

  1. Changhua Christian Hospital [109-CCH-CYCU-001, 109CCH-IRP-008, 110-CCH-IRP-20]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With a decreasing incidence of peptic ulcer bleeding, the experience of managing patients with PUB among young endoscopists has declined accordingly. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has shown great potential in the field of gastroenterology, particularly in enhancing human performance. The introduction of AI technologies may soon impact endoscopists' clinical practice by improving the quality of care for patients with PUB.
With the decreasing incidence of peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB) over the past two decades, the clinician experience of managing patients with PUB has also declined, especially for young endoscopists. A patient with PUB management requires collaborative care involving the emergency department, gastroenterologist, radiologist, and surgeon, from initial assessment to hospital discharge. The application of artificial intelligence (AI) methods has remarkably improved people's lives. In particular, AI systems have shown great potential in many areas of gastroenterology to increase human performance. Colonoscopy polyp detection or diagnosis by an AI system was recently introduced for commercial use to improve endoscopist performance. Although PUB is a longstanding health problem, these newly introduced AI technologies may soon impact endoscopists' clinical practice by improving the quality of care for these patients. To update the current status of AI application in PUB, we reviewed recent relevant literature and provided future perspectives that are required to integrate such AI tools into real-world practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available