4.7 Article

Non-Invasive Indirect Markers of Liver Fibrosis after Interferon-Free Treatment for Hepatitis C

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 10, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10173951

Keywords

hepatitis C; 3D regimen; HCV eradication; non-invasive fibrosis markers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated the usefulness of non-invasive indirect biomarkers in the treatment of HCV with the 3D regimen, showing effective levels of liver fibrosis markers post-treatment. The undetectable HCV RNA after 12 weeks indicated 100% virus eradication.
The effectiveness of interferon-free therapy during the course of HCV infection has already been confirmed. Liver fibrosis can be assessed in several ways, from biopsies to imaging tests. The present study evaluates the usefulness of non-invasive indirect biomarkers of liver fibrosis (APRI, GAPRI, FORNS, FIB-4, the AP index and HUI score) as markers of the effective treatment of HCV with the 3D regimen. Blood samples were collected from 70 patients suffering from chronic hepatitis C. Patients received the 3D AbbVie regimen for hepatitis C. All patients had HCV genotype 1b. The APRI, GAPRI, FIB-4, FORNS, HUI and AP index (age-platelet score) values were calculated with their respective algorithms. The stage of fibrosis was evaluated on the basis of a liver biopsy and confirmed by FibroScan-based transient elastography. An undetectable level of HCV RNA after 12 weeks of treatment with the 3D regimen indicates 100% eradication of hepatitis C virus. After the treatment, non-invasive indirect markers of liver fibrosis achieved levels below the limit for significant fibrosis, Thus, non-invasive indirect biomarkers of hepatic fibrosis failed to detect the presence of significant fibrosis, which was proved in histopathological examination. However, the eradication of hepatitis C virus by means of the 3D regimen treatment does not mean that patients were completely cured.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available