4.7 Article

Intratumoral combination therapy with poly(I:C) and resiquimod synergistically triggers tumor-associated macrophages for effective systemic antitumoral immunity

Journal

JOURNAL FOR IMMUNOTHERAPY OF CANCER
Volume 9, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002408

Keywords

immunity; innate; macrophages; lung neoplasms; immunotherapy

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of Health (IMH) [PCIN-2017129/AEI, MINECO-PCIN-2017-129/AEI]
  2. Worldwide Cancer Research UK
  3. Associazione Italiana Ricerca Cancro [21 147]
  4. FIRC-AIRC fellowship for Italy
  5. Marie Sklodowska-Curie Individual European Fellowship [H2020-MSCA-IF-2014-EF-ST]
  6. European Commission
  7. Fundacion de la Asociacion Espanola Contra el Cancer [658592]
  8. Xunta de Galicia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrated the superior efficacy of poly(I:C) combined with R848 compared to single treatments or combined with R837 in reprogramming macrophages towards M1-like antitumor effectors in vitro, leading to significant prevention of tumor growth and metastasis in lung cancer and fibrosarcoma mouse models. The therapy also induced systemic antitumoral response and resistance to tumor rechallenge through boosted macrophage cytotoxic activity and T-cell proliferation. Proteomic experiments validated the activation of innate immunity by poly(I:C)+R848 combination, with the key activation of the STAT1 pathway.
Background Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) play a key immunosuppressive role that limits the ability of the immune system to fight cancer and hinder the antitumoral efficacy of most treatments currently applied in the clinic. Previous studies have evaluated the antitumoral immune response triggered by (TLR) agonists, such as poly(I:C), imiquimod (R837) or resiquimod (R848) as monotherapies; however, their combination for the treatment of cancer has not been explored. This study investigates the antitumoral efficacy and the macrophage reprogramming triggered by poly(I:C) combined with R848 or with R837, versus single treatments. Methods TLR agonist treatments were evaluated in vitro for toxicity and immunostimulatory activity by Alamar Blue, ELISA and flow cytometry using primary human and murine M-CSF-differentiated macrophages. Cytotoxic activity of TLR-treated macrophages toward cancer cells was evaluated with an in vitro functional assay by flow cytometry. For in vivo experiments, the CMT167 lung cancer model and the MN/MCA1 fibrosarcoma model metastasizing to lungs were used; tumor-infiltrating leukocytes were evaluated by flow cytometry, RT-qPCR, multispectral immunophenotyping, quantitative proteomic experiments, and protein-protein interaction analysis. Results Results demonstrated the higher efficacy of poly(I:C) combined with R848 versus single treatments or combined with R837 to polarize macrophages toward M1-like antitumor effectors in vitro. In vivo, the intratumoral synergistic combination of poly(I:C)+R848 significantly prevented tumor growth and metastasis in lung cancer and fibrosarcoma immunocompetent murine models. Regressing tumors showed increased infiltration of macrophages with a higher M1:M2 ratio, recruitment of CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells, accompanied by a reduction of immunosuppressive CD206(+) TAMs and FOXP3(+)/CD4(+) T cells. The depletion of both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells resulted in complete loss of treatment efficacy. Treated mice acquired systemic antitumoral response and resistance to tumor rechallenge mediated by boosted macrophage cytotoxic activity and T-cell proliferation. Proteomic experiments validate the superior activation of innate immunity by poly(I:C)+R848 combination versus single treatments or poly(I:C)+R837, and protein-protein-interaction network analysis reveal the key activation of the STAT1 pathway. Discussion These findings demonstrate the antitumor immune responses mediated by macrophage activation on local administration of poly(I:C)+R848 combination and support the intratumoral application of this therapy to patients with solid tumors in the clinic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available