4.8 Article

Accelerating computational discovery of porous solids through improved navigation of energy-structure-function maps

Journal

SCIENCE ADVANCES
Volume 7, Issue 33, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abi4763

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. STFC Hartree Centre's Innovation Return on Research Programme - Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
  2. Leverhulme Trust
  3. European Research Council under the European Union [307358]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [307358] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study introduces a new method using parallel Bayesian optimization to acquire ESF data, providing the same level of insight at a lower computational cost and paving the way for high-throughput virtual screening. By greatly reducing the opportunity risk associated with the choice of system, this approach achieved a significant computational speedup in a specific research scenario.
While energy-structure-function (ESF) maps are a powerful new tool for in silico materials design, the cost of acquiring an ESF map for many properties is too high for routine integration into high-throughput virtual screening workflows. Here, we propose the next evolution of the ESF map. This uses parallel Bayesian optimization to selectively acquire energy and property data, generating the same levels of insight at a fraction of the computational cost. We use this approach to obtain a two orders of magnitude speedup on an ESF study that focused on the discovery of molecular crystals for methane capture, saving more than 500,000 central processing unit hours from the original protocol. By accelerating the acquisition of insight from ESF maps, we pave the way for the use of these maps in automated ultrahigh-throughput screening pipelines by greatly reducing the opportunity risk associated with the choice of system to calculate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available