4.8 Article

High- and low-latitude forcings drive Atacama Desert rainfall variations over the past 16,000 years

Journal

SCIENCE ADVANCES
Volume 7, Issue 38, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abg1333

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Late Quaternary precipitation dynamics in the central Andes are influenced by high- and low-latitude atmospheric teleconnections. By studying the relationship between fecal pellet diameters from ashy chinchilla rats and mean annual rainfall, researchers reconstructed pluvials in the Atacama Desert over the past 16,000 years and identified different influences on wet episodes from North Atlantic forcing to low-latitude ENSO regime shifts. This study provides insights into future hydroclimatic variability in the central Andes and offers potential for reconstructing past climates using rodent middens in desert ecosystems worldwide.
Late Quaternary precipitation dynamics in the central Andes have been linked to both high- and low-latitude atmospheric teleconnections. We use present-day relationships between fecal pellet diameters from ashy chinchilla rats (Abrocoma cinerea) and mean annual rainfall to reconstruct the timing and magnitude of pluvials (wet episodes) spanning the past 16,000 years in the Atacama Desert based on 81 C-14-dated A. cinerea paleomiddens. A transient climate simulation shows that pluvials identified at 15.9 to 14.8, 13.0 to 8.6, and 8.1 to 7.6 ka B.P. can be linked to North Atlantic (high-latitude) forcing (e. g., Heinrich Stadial 1, Younger Dryas, and Bond cold events). Holocene pluvials at 5.0 to 4.6, 3.2 to 2.1, and 1.4 to 0.7 ka B.P. are not simulated, implying low-latitude internal variability forcing (i.e., ENSO regime shifts). These results help constrain future central Andean hydroclimatic variability and hold promise for reconstructing past climates from rodent middens in desert ecosystems worldwide.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available