4.2 Review

MicroRNA clustering on the biogenesis of suboptimal microRNAs

Journal

APPLIED BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 64, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER SINGAPORE PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s13765-021-00624-3

Keywords

miRNA cluster; Pri-miR-144~451; Suboptimal structure; Non-canonical biogenesis; Microprocessor

Funding

  1. Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development [PJ01577601]
  2. Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIT) [2021R1A5A1032428]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2021R1A5A1032428] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most microRNAs are processed by two ribonuclease III enzymes, but some that are structurally suboptimal are expressed at levels similar to or higher than their structurally optimal neighbors, possibly due to their clustered orientation.
Most microRNAs (miRNAs) are processed by two ribonuclease III enzymes. The first cleavage is performed by Microprocessor that is composed of RNase III enzyme Drosha and DGCR8, and the second by another RNase III enzyme Dicer. There are many examples of miRNAs that are poor substrates for Drosha and Dicer, owing to their suboptimal structures. However, a number of these suboptimal miRNAs are known to be expressed at the same or higher level as their neighboring structurally-optimal miRNAs. Recent studies suggest that the clustered orientation of these suboptimal miRNAs is the explanation for this phenomenon. It has been observed that the biogenesis of these suboptimal miRNAs can be affected by the expression of their neighboring optimal miRNAs. This principle is expected to apply more broadly, as it has been shown that a large percentage of suboptimal miRNAs reside within operons.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available