4.6 Article

Humidity-Assisted Chlorination with Solid Protection Strategy for Efficient Air-Fabricated Inverted CsPbI3 Perovskite Solar Cells

Journal

ACS ENERGY LETTERS
Volume 6, Issue 10, Pages 3661-3668

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c01817

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52173161, 61974150, 62104047, 51773213]
  2. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS [QYZDB-SSW-JSC047]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (ECNU)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Humidity-assisted chlorination with solid protection via Si-Cl incorporation is effective for reducing moisture erosion during deposition of CsPbI3 perovskite solar cells in air. The solid protection from Si-OH helps improve the crystallization and phase stability of CsPbI3, resulting in high efficiency and moisture tolerance.
Humidity-assisted chlorination with solid protection via 1,2-bis(chlorodimethylsilyl)ethane (Si-Cl) incorporation is demonstrated as an effective strategy to address water erosion for efficient air-fabricated inverted CsPbI3 perovskite solar cells (PSCs). Si-Cl molecules can rapidly react with water to reduce moisture erosion during deposition in air. In addition, the hydrolysis production of hydrogen chloride (HCl) can chlorinate CsPbI3 while the spontaneous polymerization of 1,2-bis(hydroxydimethylsilyl)ethane (Si-OH) builds a solid protection, which would improve the crystallization and phase stability of CsPbI3. Therefore, a champion efficiency of 18.93% with high open-circuit voltage of 1.176 V is achieved, which is the highest efficiency among the inverted inorganic PSCs. Furthermore, the moisture tolerance of both the CsPbI3 films and air-fabricated PSCs gets significant improvement. In addition, the nonencapsulated device shows good operational stability without efficiency drop after 1 sun illumination at 65 degrees C for 900 h.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available