4.6 Article

Cross-Linked Chains of Metal-Organic Framework Afford Continuous Ion Transport in Solid Batteries

Journal

ACS ENERGY LETTERS
Volume 6, Issue 7, Pages 2434-2441

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c00583

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51920105004, 51902060, 52090021]
  2. Foundation for Young Talents in Higher Education of Guangdong, China [2018KQNCX065]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong, China [2019A1515010842]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Continuous ion-conductive paths were constructed by cross-linked MOF chains, leading to improved performance of solid-state batteries with more than 100% enhanced specific capacity and stable cycling performance. This work provides a splendid strategy for developing high-performance solid electrolytes with porous ion conductors.
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have attracted intensive study as solid electrolytes (SEs) in recent years. However, MOF particles work separately in SEs and numerous interfaces hinder a high-efficiency ion transport, which lowers the performance of solid-state batteries (SSBs). Herein, continuous ion-conductive paths were constructed by cross-linked MOF chains. Chains of a newly developed MOF (Zr-BPDC-2SO(3)H) were grown on bacterial cellulose (BC) nanofibers to provide a continuous ion transport network. The cross-linked MOF chains exhibit a high ionic conductivity of 7.88 X 10(-4)S cm(-1) at 25 degrees C, single-ion transport ability (t(Li)(+)=0.88), a wide electrochemical window up to 5.10 V, excellent interface compatibility, and the capability for suppressing lithium dendrites. Most importantly, the SSB fabricated with the cross-linked MOF chains shows more than 100% improved specific capacity in comparison to an SSB without this design and stable cycling performance at 3 C. This work provides a splendid strategy for developing high-performance SEs with porous ion conductors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available