4.3 Article

Preparation of cassava fiber-iron nanoparticles composite for electrochemical determination of tea polyphenol

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD MEASUREMENT AND CHARACTERIZATION
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages 4711-4717

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11694-021-01030-5

Keywords

Tea polyphenols; Cassava fibers; Electroanalytical sensor; Iron nanoparticles; Beverages detection

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22004026]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a novel electrochemical sensor for the detection of tea polyphenols was developed using cassava fibers and iron nanoparticles. Optimization of parameters enhanced the sensing performance, and validation in real samples showed potential application in beverages.
Rapid detection of tea polyphenol is necessary in food and beverages. In this work, we used cassava fibers as a substrate on which iron nanoparticles were immobilized. The proposed composite was used for surface modification of glassy carbon electrodes to prepare an electrochemical sensor for the detection of tea polyphenols. The SEM characterization results show that the iron nanoparticles on the surface of the cassava fibers were distributed uniformly. We investigated the electrochemical behavior of tea polyphenols on the surface of modified electrodes. The result indicated that the iron nanoparticles could facilitate the electron transfer rate and subsequently enhance the sensing performance. Meanwhile, we have optimized the detection parameters. The proposed sensor can linearly increase the peak current of tea polyphenol oxidation in the range of 3.5-31.5 mu M with a equation of I (mu A) = 0.01285c + 0.89734 (r = 0.9958). The detection limit can be calculated to be 0.1 mu M. In addition, we have validated the proposed sensors in real samples. The results demonstrate that this sensor can be potentially used for the detection of tea polyphenols in beverages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available